RE: RPI Projections

[Brian Johnson]

Yes, but I would also think our recent 3-6 swoon would
have played a role in knocking us down a seed or two. 


--- Keith Wedinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> I can believe this.  One has to consider:
>
> 1.  UC has a very strong schedule
> 2.  UC has beaten 3 teams that at the time were in
> the top 10 of the RPI
> 3.  The teams UC has lost to are not slouches. 
> Granted, most of us consider
> the losses to DePaul, SLU and Charlotte to be
> unacceptable but none of these
> are bad teams.
> 4.  Margin of victory/loss is not considered at all
> by the RPI or by the
> NCAA selection committee.  A one point win is every
> bit as good as a 30
> point win.  Style points don't count.
>
> J. Keith Wedinger 
> Senior Software Developer 
> Sterling Commerce 
>   
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Seger
> [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:15 PM
> To: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: [UC Basketball] RPI Projections
>
> The new RPI seedings are out.  They have UC listed
> as a #7 seed.
> Unbelievable.  For comparison, the other #7s are
> California, Purdue and
> Missouri.
>  
> Marquette is a 2, and both Louisville and Memphis
> are 5 seeds.
>  
> Sincerely,
>  
> Mark J. Seger
> Managing Director
> Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC
>  
>  


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/