Previous Message:
Re: Huggins thinks UC can make Sweet 16
Re: Huggins thinks UC can make Sweet 16
Next Message:
Re: UC Post Players
Re: UC Post Players
Re: UC Post Players
From: Zuke
Date: 03 Mar 2003 - 11:19 AM EST
Date: 03 Mar 2003 - 11:19 AM EST
In article <address@hidden>,
Brad Holdheide <address@hidden> wrote:
Question:
Which UC "Big Man" has a reasonably good post game, can consistently score
with his back to the basket, has never had a 1-8 or 3-14 type shooting
night, and averages over 9 rebounds/40 minutes of playing time?
Answer:
Rod Flowers
I just don't see why Rod is not given more opportunity to play. I know his
defense is lacking, but is it bad enough to force UC into putting a guy out
there that can't score or isn't even a threat to score. Playing 4 on 5
every game really hurts. Rod is a threat to score, can score, and averages
more rebounds/minute than every player on the team except for Hicks.
When your offense is as lacking as UC's is I'd think you'd take some chances
with guys like Rod and Chad Moore to create some offense.
Just my 2 cents.
His defense is nonexistent. Rod Flowers couldn't cover me. I've never
seen a weaker defensive player in my life. I think that's why you see
him more in the ECU game but against Memphis, Marquette and UofL he's
not going to stir from the bench. He should have played football where
you can play one way.
Later,
Zuke
--
You are in control until you are out of control.
- Follow Ups:
- Re: UC Post Players, Darryl Gilliam
- References:
- UC Post Players
- From: Brad Holdheide
- UC Post Players
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


