INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

Re: Cats Win -- Cats Win -- Cats Win



From: Chris Sorge
Date: 02 Mar 2003 - 00:42 AM EST

Couldn't disagree moore ;) I think Barker is a big part of the problem.
Although I will admit, I saw some things from him tonight that I did
actually like. That little stutter step drive to the hoop lay in was very
nice, and he looked up court a little bit as well which I liked.
Unfortunatley, his job is to run the offense, which he is not good at doing,
see 48 total points.

Chris


---- Original Message -----
From: "Brian McCann" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Cats Win -- Cats Win -- Cats Win


Do you really think Memphis is the best team you have seen this year?? I
think we beat ourselves in the second half, Memphis did nothing as far as
stepping up their game, we just looked clueless on offense.

We didn't lose by 19 because of how well Memphis played, we lost by 19
because of missed dunks, missed jump shots, the inability to hit a few
stick
backs off of some rebounds.

Oh yeah, who is this Tony Barker guy? I am all for playing the freshmen
more. Despite Chadd's defense (giving up wide open threes), I would still
like him out there for 10-12 minutes a game just to change the pace on
offense. As for Barker, I would rather not beat a dead horse and drag up
that topic again. There are plenty of other things to complain about.



All Barker did was hand out six assists with no turnovers and he was one
rebound awat from leading the team in rebounding for the THIRD straight
game (He had 7).

Barker is not the problem.



Brian McCann
Associate Sports Information Director
University of Cincinnati
One Edwards Center, Suite 1110-G
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0021
(O): (513) 556-0617
(H): (513) 481-5002
(Fax): (513) 556-0619






To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.