INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
Re: Bobbitt Quits?
Next Message:
Re: Bobbitt Quits?

Re: Bobbitt Quits?



From: Chris Sorge
Date: 05 Feb 2003 - 02:50 PM EST

That's fine, but.........

Can we compare the styles of the top twenty five pg's? I would be willing
to bet that those, that are not as highly rated as Barker, score more, and
create easier shots for their teammates, that is thier job after all isnt
it?

Really, doesn't Taron just stand at the top of the circle and pass to Field
when he comes off a screen? I will be very interested to see how Taron
handles a real pressing defense tonight (if that is indeed what UL uses
against us), and see how many if any turnovers he has. I would venture to
say that players who lead in that catagory (assist to turnover) play for
teams that either do not score a lot, or they do basically what Taron does,
which isn't much. ;-)

Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "jon breiner" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Bobbitt Quits?


Predicting that stats would progress in a linear fashion is a dangerous
argument that rarely if ever comes to fruition, so I will definitely
take it with a grain of salt.

But if you were to give me that PG, I would take him.

Lance did a study of the top 35 teams in the RPI and looked at the
assist to TO ratio of the PG's and only one was better than Barker, the
guy from Georgia. There are neough stats to make many different
arguments! :)

jon b

Chris Sorge wrote:

I have been doing a little bit of stat comparison just for the heck of it
this afternoon....

What if I told you I could give you a point guard, who handles the ball
better then Taron, drives to the basket, and creates shots for his
teammates. He averages twice as many points, slightly fewer rebounds,
but
more assists, 3 times as many steals, 3 times as many blocks, but not
quite
as tenacious on the ball defender (even though he should be guarding
point
guards which USUALLY are not the primary threat) what would you say?
Then
what if I told you this person is already on the team? Finally, what
would
you think, that of the 5 losses this season, during that span this person
has averaged 2.8 min/game? Or 7 mins/game during the last two losses.

This information is based off of the minutes that the starting point
guard
gets...so take actual final stats with a small grain of salt.
Coincidentally, over the past 5 game stretch where we have gradually been
going down hill, this player has averaged about 8 mins per game.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "jon breiner" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Bobbitt Quits?




Sure. First of all, I think it explains why Barker plays and why Hicks
does not. Barker is probably one of the biggest efoort guys on the team
and knows what he is doing offensively and defensively. He may be
limited in some terms (driving to the basket for example although he is
improving here), but he makes very few mistakes in Huggin's schemes. I
am not sold on Hick's efforts or knowledge of the schemes, but would
like to see him get more playing time than Hollman and Johnson purely
based on potential. As for Hollman and Johnson, they have the advantage
of "taking chemistry" in a year where students who play their position
are few and far between. As I said in a post awhile ago, I think Hicks
should play because if Hollman and Johnson neither one will produce
offensively or play defense or rebound, that I believed Hicks could
"out-stat " them and be a comparable liability.

Personally, I have the advantage of holding all my students up against
all others to ever "play" in my classroom. My curve is set year in and
year out. If I get 10 A's one quarter and none the next, that is ok. I
know what an A is and I do not give it to someone just because I feel
the need to give "x" number per year. If Donald Little was here, this
would be a moot (not mute!!!) point because Hollman and Johnson and
Hicks would be fighting for minutes backing up him and Maxiell.

jon b




Chris Sorge wrote:



That is a good analogy Jon, and I agree with your determination.


However,


can you apply this to Johnson, Hollman, Hicks, and Barker?

Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "jon breiner" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Bobbitt Quits?






Allow me to try an analogy. One of my students studies as much or
more
than any student. There is effort there, but he never learns how to
actually do anything. Sure he is capable of the basic skills, can do
some of the math, knows the periodic table, but cannot seem to put a
series of the skills together. When put in a group project, the
student
wants to do well, and tries harder than some of the others, but ends
up
bringing the rest of the group down due to the failure to execute in
thiss setting. Occassionally this student shows a spark, has done
well
on a few quizzes, but mostly just barely passes the exams.

What grade should this student get? Is the grade a reward or earned?

I think this anaolgy applies because while I think Bobbitt gives a lot
of effort, it is often misplaced. Using the effort to understand
positioning on the offensive and defensive end is important in
Huggin's
schemes. While Bobbitt has shown basic skills, I have rarely seen him
string together the skills in a team setting. With that said, I have
called for him to receive more playing time in the hope that it would
make a difference, but trying hard physcially, and trying hard
physically while being mentally perpared to play a team game are
disctinctly different IMHO.

Looking at it from a player's perspective, I have yet to meet the
player
who thinks they do not deserve more playing time. That will never
change. And Huggins has not changed, he is very clear on what needs
to
be done. Some players come and ask him "what needs to be done" and he
tells them what they need to change in order to get more playing time.
Maybe Bobbitt did this, I do not know.


jon b


Chris Sorge wrote:





Look, think about this from a players perspective, and stop thinking




about




it as a fan who wants their team to win. Bobbit is not from


Cincinnati,




he




probably does not have a great understanding of what this team means
to




this




city (only consistent winning program). What he does know, is that
he




came




in, surely, busted his ass more then he ever has before, is one of
the




few




players on the team with heart and emotion, and consistently cheering


his


team on from the bench. Only to average 8 minutes a game since the
TCU
game?

Plus he sees a very capable player that plays his position, that has




been




on the team for 3 years in front of him for the next two seasons.
Why


is


this worth it? They aren't going to win the National Championship,


heck


they aren't even going to win the C-USA title for a couple years.
How




does




this player get rewarded for his hard work and effort? I have no
doubt




he




works hard, because he is one of the first players off the bench,
sure


he


makes stupid mistakes, but that doesn't mean he isn't trying...Where
is




the




reward, or the light at the end of the tunnel? Field has still been
in




the




program for 3 years, and won't be going anywhere while Bobbit is/was




here.




Chris



















To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.