Previous Message:
Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
Next Message:
Re: Barker Injury Question
Re: Barker Injury Question
Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
From: Chris Sorge
Date: 03 Jan 2003 - 02:39 PM EST
Date: 03 Jan 2003 - 02:39 PM EST
Could not agree more! We gain absolutely ZERO playing Hollman/Johnson.
Hicks is a better defensive rebounder, offensive rebounder, scorer, shot
blocker, and athlete then both of those stiffs combined! And if Max can
play as "tall" as they are, what reasons are there for not going with that
combo?
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "jabor" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [UC Basketball] Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
Is Max really that different defensively than having Little in the middle?long
I remember an article last year stating that because Max's arms are so
he had the same reach as Little. Therefore, shouldn't we be ascomfortable
with Max in the middle as we would be with Little?
Put Hicks in the 4 spot. What combo would you rather have: Little/Max or
Max/Hicks?
Original Message:
-----------------
From: richard l. kandell address@hidden
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:57:13 -0500
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
3. As to this year - we still really don't have a "5" - and this may
cause some problems down the road against teams who do.
- Follow Ups:
- Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run, Brian Johnson
- References:
- Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
- From: jabor
- Re: RE: Depth+Tough Schedule=Deep NCAA Run
To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.


