INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
Re: Basketball Poster
Next Message:
RE: Tony Baloney

Re: Tony Baloney



From: richard l. kandell
Date: 10 Oct 2002 - 10:39 PM EST

If Bobbitt is as good as advertised you are right, except if BJ gets his
weight under control. This team has some interesting questions:

1. Can Stokes be the leader as a 4th year starter that he should be?
Will he come to play every game - can he play at the level he played at
during the UCLA game consistently, game in and game out?

2. Will Hicks fully recover from gun shot and surgery?

3. How much will Kirkland contribute being a freshman with a broken jaw,
which will set him even further behind?

4. Of what value, if any, will Gene Land be after not playing for all
these years?

5. Can Hollman, Johnson or Grove be effective in the middle (rebound,
defense, stickbacks) aside from the fact that they provide a total of 15
fouls to give?

6. Is Barker the answer at the point?

7. Will Moore be able to provide back up for Barker when needed, or will
we have some one playing out of place?

8. After several years will Field still be happy coming off the bench as
the first perimeter sub?

9. Will Flowers actually contribute? and, the most important question of
all:

10. How much will Huggins actually be able to coach?


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hall" <address@hidden>
To: "Bbforum (E-mail)" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Tony Baloney




On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, LaCombe, Andy wrote:

Let's hear some starting lineups...

Maxiell, Stokes and Barker are locks barring injury. At this point I'd go
with Bobbit and Holman for the other two, unless B.J. makes his
target weight in the next week or so.


- John in Mn





Follow Ups:
RE: Tony Baloney, ALACOMBE

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.