INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  
Previous Message:
Re: Valpo
Next Message:
Re: Valpo

Re: Valpo



From: Jonathan Breiner
Date: 14 Aug 2002 - 08:43 AM EST

In defense of the Valpo arrangement, they are a good midmajor, but one we
should beat so it will help the RPI. They are also better than most
directional-hyphen U's that come into the Shoe for fodder. The main
difference instead of a one for none, this is a two for one. Not exactly
sure of the rational, but I think it is great that UC is one of the few
major programs willing to do this. Maybe they should have held out for 3
for one though! :)

jon b


----- Original Message -----
From: "Darryl Gilliam" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [UC Basketball] Valpo



Is our scheduling the result of the top schools not wanting to play us or
is it that we would rather play a Valpo? Does anyone on this board know the
answer? We used to play a lot tougher schedule.
address@hidden wrote:In a message dated 8/13/02 6:48:46 PM
Eastern Daylight Time,
address@hidden writes:


This Bearcat
fan thinks this Valpo thing is very uninspiring.


I also :-(



---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs, a Yahoo! service - Search Thousands of New Jobs


--------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: address@hidden
For additional commands, e-mail: address@hidden



To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.