INDEX BY:    DATE | THREAD | AUTHOR  

RE: Huggins Lunches with Nuggets GM



From: Tipton, Christopher
Date: 06 Jun 2002 - 10:11 AM EST


I'm at a loss here. Is Huggs now condemned to never have a lunch, or
get-together, with anyone in a position to offer him a job? That makes no
sense whatsoever.

If he says it has no meaning, why can't we accept that it has no meaning?
Why is evrything he does put under a microscope for us to question? Give it
a break.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Holdheide [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:39 AM
To: 'address@hidden'
Subject: [UC Basketball] Huggins Lunches with Nuggets GM


Is it just me or is anyone else getting sick of this. Huggs has an
"informal" lunch with Nuggets GM Kiki Vandeweghe and then wants to play it
off as it not meaning anything. It has already been reported that the Kiki
is intrigued by Huggs and that the Nuggets may pursue him for thier head
coaching position. So WHY would Bob agree to have lunch with him if he has
no intent of at least not listening to a potential offer.

All Huggs is doing is creating more controversy and potentially hurting his
recruiting. With so many top level recruits seriously considering UC, why
would you (as a head coach) take a chance at giving these recruits a reason
to not pick UC.

It seems like Bob just likes to make controversy. Unless he is seriously
considering taking the Denver job, I can't see any reason why he would do
this.

I'm not trying to stir up anything. I'm just getting frustrated with this
year in and year out.

--------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: address@hidden
For additional commands, e-mail: address@hidden


--------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: address@hidden
For additional commands, e-mail: address@hidden



Follow Ups:
RE: Huggins Lunches with Nuggets GM, Brian McCann

To subscribe, please follow the instructions here.